12-12-2009 10:14 AM - edited 12-12-2009 10:26 AM
I am trying to get some questions answered for a customer. One of them has to do with the port buffer size for the EX4200. The Juniper documentation states that port buffers for the EX8200 series switches are:
- Buffer per 10-Gigabit Ethernet port: 512 MB
- Buffer per 1-Gigabit Ethernet port: 42 MB
I can't seem to find any documentation in regards to the EX4200. Can anyone comment or validate that it is the same on this platform as with the 8200? I am looking or buffer size and it is per port or shared pool?
Solved! Go to Solution.
12-13-2009 02:34 AM
each PFE (24 ports) on EX3200/EX4200 has approximately 2.5 MB.
*** Buffer Mgmt on EX4200 platform ***
Each port gets resources from two pool types:
- "Dedicated" pool
- "Shared" pool
The allocation of buffers from the Dedicated pool is controlled by configuration:
- If a buffer-size percentage is configured for a class, the number of buffers assigned will be proportional to that percentage
- If no buffer-size is configured for a class or classes, the remaining percentage will be equally shared between those classes
The allocation of buffers from the Shared pool is dynamically performed according to the queueing needs of a class, and it cannot be controlled by configuration
- When a queue needs to buffer traffic, it first consumes the allocated resources from the Dedicated pool. Once those resources are consumed, it may get assigned more buffers from the Shared pool
- Only PLP low traffic may get buffers from the Shared pool
- Thus the number of PLP high packets that may be queued is bounded by the size of the Dedicated pool
If this worked for you please flag my post as an "Accepted Solution" so others can benefit. A kudo would be cool if you think I earned it.
12-17-2009 10:16 AM
I think your post is nice, but you neglected to mention from which user facing document you pulled this information. Would you mind? If there are no user facing docs, it would be helpful to know how to adjust the dedicated pool size as well the releases that support this configuration, should it not be universally supported. Thanks in advance.