Dear all regarding this subject im not sure about when using each encapsulation.
Consider both followin configs:
#####################this config:
ae9 {
flexible-vlan-tagging;
encapsulation flexible-ethernet-services;
unit 2 {
encapsulation vlan-bridge;
vlan-id 2;
}
unit 3 {
encapsulation vlan-bridge;
vlan-id 3;
}
}
######################is the same?
ae9 {
encapsulation extended-vlan-bridge;
flexible-vlan-tagging;
unit 2 {
vlan-id 2;
}
unit 3 {
vlan-id 3;
}
}
what i understand is that using flexible-ethernet-service, i will be able to use different encapsulations for each logic units, instead extended-vlan-bridge is applied to all logical units, Im right?
Im planning to set the same config on two or more interface and then bind them in the same bridge-domain with an irb interface, so ....
Can I use any of the previous configs ? wich is better?
btw , currently im running several routing instances
I know I should declare the irb interfaces inside the routing instances where they are going to work, but what about the bride-domains ? should be declared in the same routing instance or can be declared global?
Thanks,
Leo.