HI everyone,
I am trying to learn how the " order " does not matter when using Route-list in import routing policy ( assuming different prefix ).
Please consider the following Policy:
Our toplogy:
R5 (200.200.200.50)-----200.200.200.4 em0.200 JUN4
R5: Cisco router, running RIP Ver2 with Juniper JUN4, it is advertsining 2.2.2.0/24. 5.5.5.0/24, 50.50.50.0/24
We will apply the above policy as IMPUT POLICY TO RIP on JUN4, but before we apply the policy, routing table on JUN4 is:
Above we can see all the RIP routes.
Next we apply the policy " MISSY" as an IMPORT POLICY to RIP on JUN4
We expect only single RIP route 5.5.5.0/24 based on IMPORT POLICY MISSY, however we do not see any RIP routes:
If we remove the policy, we see all the rip routes:
Based on Juniper doc, longest match term will be evaluated first which is TERM2 here but we do not see this here.
What am i missing?
Thanks and have a nice day!!