Junos
Reply
Contributor
Shabbir
Posts: 14
Registered: ‎11-19-2008
0

Re: m320 multiservice ethernet (vrf)

when i configured vrf-table-label on both side then

 

then on router B

 

 show route table TEST

TEST.inet.0: 3 destinations, 3 routes (3 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both

10.10.253.0/30     *[BGP/170] 00:00:14, localpref 100, from 10.1.1.1
                      AS path: I
                    > via e3-0/1/0.0, Push 16, Push 339152(top)
192.168.100.1/32   *[BGP/170] 00:00:14, localpref 100, from 10.1.1.1
                      AS path: I
                    > via e3-0/1/0.0, Push 16, Push 339152(top)
192.168.100.2/32   *[Direct/0] 5d 07:30:13
                    > via lo0.100



 ping 10.10.253.2 routing-instance TEST
PING 10.10.253.2 (10.10.253.2): 56 data bytes
^C
--- 10.10.253.2 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss

 

 

 and router A

 

run show interfaces fe-0/0/1 terse
Interface               Admin Link Proto    Local                 Remote
fe-0/0/1                up    up
fe-0/0/1.0              up    up   inet     10.10.253.2/30
                                   multiservice
 

Recognized Expert
erdems
Posts: 192
Registered: ‎12-30-2008

Re: m320 multiservice ethernet (vrf)

[ Edited ]

Shabbir,

 

 I've quickly copied your setup and it is working indeed, but you also had mentioned that the relatively same configuration was already working between another two of your routers, so that's probably not big news to you :-)

 

 I see you have a services PIC installed, would you try using "vt- interfaces method" instead of vrf-table-label and see if it makes an improvement?

 

(assuming you have vt-0/2/0 on both routers and remove vrf-table-label)

 

set interfaces vt-0/2/0.0 description "for vpn test"

set interfaces vt-0/2/0.0 family inet

set interfaces vt-0/2/0.0 family mpls

set routing-instances TEST interface vt-0/2/0.0

 

If that doesn't help or you only have services PIC in one of them, please provide the following:

 

1. How the two M320's are connected to each other ?

2. your protocols/bgp configuration (including import/export policies)

3. your lo0.x filters (if any)

4. your [edit groups] and [edit apply-groups] configurations (if any)

 

Cheers,

Erdem

 

 

 

 

 

 

____________________________________________
If you think your question's answered, please
mark the respective post as "Accepted Solution".

Kudos are an excellent way of showing appreciation, too.
Contributor
Shabbir
Posts: 14
Registered: ‎11-19-2008
0

Re: m320 multiservice ethernet (vrf)

i inserted the lines u sujjested and removed vrf-table but no success (routes are not advertised to other vrf)

set routing-instances TEST instance-type vrf
set routing-instances TEST interface lo0.100
set routing-instances TEST interface fe-0/0/1.0
set routing-instances TEST interface vt-0/2/0.0
set routing-instances TEST route-distinguisher 65000:1001
set routing-instances TEST vrf-import vfr-import
set routing-instances TEST vrf-export vfr-export
set routing-instances TEST routing-options interface-routes family inet export lan


1. M320 are connected through E3 link (kind of back to back :smileytongue: )

2. bgp configuration is already pasted, ospf is running as IGP, mpls is enabled on e3s and e1s -> to pops

3.  no filters applied on lo0.XX

4. just e3 and e1 l1 configurations 

 

{

 

set groups e1-int interfaces <e1-*> e1-options framing g704
set groups e1-int interfaces <e1-*> e1-options fcs 16
set groups e1-int interfaces <e1-*> e1-options idle-cycle-flag flags
set groups e1-int interfaces <e1-*> e1-options start-end-flag filler
set groups e3-int interfaces <e3-*> e3-options fcs 16
set groups e3-int interfaces <e3-*> e3-options idle-cycle-flag flags
set groups e3-int interfaces <e3-*> e3-options start-end-flag filler
 

}

Super Contributor
davidjdv
Posts: 114
Registered: ‎02-26-2008

Re: m320 multiservice ethernet (vrf)

The PB-4E3-QPP will show up as a 4xE3 IQ PIC in the 'show chassis hardware' so I'm afraid your setup will not support vrf-table-label when you use the E3 interfaces as to connect your PE routers.

 

The solutions are:

 - use the vt-interface method with your service-PICs as Erdem mentioned

 - use the older PB-4E3 (non-IQ) PIC

 - use another core-facing interface altogether

 

/david 

Contributor
Shabbir
Posts: 14
Registered: ‎11-19-2008
0

Re: m320 multiservice ethernet (vrf)

1. i cant make any changes in the hardware (as i dont have)

2. only have these E3 interfaces as core facing interface.

3. if u check the configuration i mentioned above, i tried with vt interface and that didnt work can u check if i configured the way it has to?

 

when i use this m320 as core and connect a m10i as access to both m320s (which are installed on our pops) then the l3 vpn works fine. as the traffice forwards through these E3s and same E320 routers.

 

thanku

Contributor
Shabbir
Posts: 14
Registered: ‎11-19-2008
0

Re: m320 multiservice ethernet (vrf)

yes problem solved with vt interface as i added a line

 

set interfaces vt-0/2/0 unit 0 family mpls

Contributor
Shabbir
Posts: 14
Registered: ‎11-19-2008
0

Re: m320 multiservice ethernet (vrf)

thanku very much both of you, kindly tell whos msg should i click solution?
Super Contributor
davidjdv
Posts: 114
Registered: ‎02-26-2008

Re: m320 multiservice ethernet (vrf)

You can give "kudos" to the messages that helped you and click solution on the message that you feel best summarizes your solution :smileyhappy:

Thanks,

/david 

Copyright© 1999-2013 Juniper Networks, Inc. All rights reserved.