No. ISIS route is active. Policy will match the active route.
run show route 1.1.1.1 extensive
inet.0: 166 destinations, 435 routes (166 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
1.1.1.1/32 (3 entries, 2 announced)
State: <FlashAll CalcForwarding>
TSI:
KRT in-kernel 10.200.1.1/32 -> {Push 303472}
IS-IS level 2, SPF version 532, currentPage 0 idx 0 Type 1 val 91ac888
@IS-IS Preference: 18
Level: 2
Next hop type: Router
Address: 0x9084558
Next-hop reference count: 4
Next hop: 10.2.2.6 via em2.25
Next hop: 10.2.2.22 via em2.35, selected
State: <Active Int>
Local AS: 4012345678
Age: 6:03 Metric: 10
Task: IS-IS
Announcement bits (4): 0-LDP 4-BGP RT Background 5-Resolve tree 4 6-Aggregate
AS path: I
#RSVP Preference: 7/1
Next hop type: Router, Next hop index: 1821
Address: 0x91bbb98
Next-hop reference count: 18
Next hop: 10.2.2.22 via em2.35 weight 0x1, selected
Label-switched-path r5-r1
Label operation: Push 303472
Label TTL action: prop-ttl
State: <ForwardingOnly Int>
Inactive reason: Forwarding use only
Local AS: 4012345678
Age: 5:40 Metric: 10
Task: RSVP
Announcement bits (1): 1-KRT
AS path: I