Routing

Hello! Cannot understand where is the mistake? Help, please, to find !

The router juniper-router-1 does not receive bgp route from the peer juniper-router-3

juniper-router-1:

[edit]
root# run show route receive-protocol bgp 117.12.11.1    

inet.0: 7 destinations, 8 routes (7 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)

root# show | no-more        
## Last changed: 2015-04-12 20:26:51 UTC
version 12.1R1.9;
interfaces {
    em0 {
        unit 0 {
            family inet {
                address 117.12.11.2/24;
            }
        }
    }
    em1 {
        unit 0 {
            family inet {
                address 10.255.255.4/24;
            }
        }
    }
    lo0 {
        unit 0 {
            family inet {
                address 192.168.93.1/32;
            }
        }
    }
}
routing-options {
    static {
        route 192.168.93.3/32 discard;
    }
    router-id 192.168.93.1;
    autonomous-system 45900;
}
protocols {
    bgp {
        group eBGP {
            type external;
            local-address 192.168.93.1;
            neighbor 117.12.11.1 {
                multihop {
                    ttl 2;
                }
                export EXPORT-BGP;
                peer-as 141;
            }
        }
        group iBGP {
            type internal;
            multihop {
                ttl 2;
            }
            local-address 192.168.93.1;
            neighbor 192.168.93.3 {
                peer-as 45900;
            }
            neighbor 192.168.93.2 {
                peer-as 45900;
            }
            neighbor 192.168.92.1 {
                peer-as 45900;
            }
        }
    }
    ospf {
        area 0.0.0.0 {
            interface em0.0;
            interface em1.0;
            interface lo0.0;
        }
    }
}
policy-options {
    policy-statement EXPORT-BGP {
        term 1 {
            from protocol static;
            then accept;
        }
        term 3 {
            then reject;
        }
    }
}

juniper-router-3:

[edit]
root# run show route advertising-protocol bgp 192.168.93.1          

inet.0: 7 destinations, 7 routes (7 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
  Prefix                  Nexthop              MED     Lclpref    AS path
* 192.168.92.3/32         117.12.11.1                             155 45900 I

root# show | no-more 
## Last changed: 2015-04-12 20:11:29 UTC
version 12.1R1.9;
interfaces {
    em0 {
        unit 0 {
            family inet {
                address 117.12.11.1/24;
            }
        }
    }
    em1 {
        unit 0 {
            family inet {
                address 128.11.11.1/24;
            }
        }
    }
}
routing-options {
    static {
        route 192.168.93.1/32 next-hop 117.12.11.2;
    }
    autonomous-system 141;
}
protocols {
    bgp {
        group eBGP {
            type external;
            multihop {
                ttl 2;
            }
            neighbor 192.168.93.1 {
                multihop {
                    ttl 2;
                }
                export NEXT-HOP;
                peer-as 45900;
            }
            neighbor 128.11.11.2 {
                peer-as 155;
            }
        }
    }
}
policy-options {
    policy-statement NEXT-HOP {
        term 1 {
            then {
                next-hop 117.12.11.1;
            }
        }
    }
}

Hi,

Can you tell me why making the BGP setup "complex" you are on one side peering on the interface address on the otherside on a loopback address, with some multihop bgp and some static routes. Why no make it simple en peer on the interfaces addresses and remove the multi-hop where possible.

also I would start advertising prefixex without any policy statement. This makes debugging a little more easy

Your idea is clear! Will simplify where possible!