Routing

last person joined: 3 days ago 

Ask questions and share experiences about ACX Series, CTP Series, MX Series, PTX Series, SSR Series, JRR Series, and all things routing, including portfolios and protocols.
  • 1.  arp request

    Posted 10-25-2012 09:00

    how does spoke work



  • 2.  RE: arp request

    Posted 10-25-2012 09:01

    thx in advacne



  • 3.  RE: arp request

    Posted 10-25-2012 12:46

    Maybe you save some problems with your devices. I've tested your config in my lab and I got the desired results:

     

     run show route receive-protocol bgp 1.1.1.1 
    
    inet.0: 9 destinations, 9 routes (9 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
    
    inet.3: 2 destinations, 2 routes (2 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
    
    VPN-A.inet.0: 6 destinations, 6 routes (6 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
      Prefix		  Nexthop	       MED     Lclpref    AS path
    * 0.0.0.0/0               1.1.1.1              0       100        I
    * 192.168.16.0/24         1.1.1.1                      100        I
    
    mpls.0: 4 destinations, 4 routes (4 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
    
    bgp.l3vpn.0: 2 destinations, 2 routes (2 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
      Prefix		  Nexthop	       MED     Lclpref    AS path
      100:1:0.0.0.0/0                     
    *                         1.1.1.1              0       100        I
      100:1:192.168.16.0/24                    
    *                         1.1.1.1                      100        I
    

    The bgp.l3vpn.0 table is missing on your r2 router. Maybe you should try a restart routing or reload.



  • 4.  RE: arp request

    Posted 10-25-2012 15:46

    Hi Rob,

    It looks like BGP sessions with other PEs were down when you checked the routing table of r2.

    Because, it doesn't show any routes recieved from remote PEs in the VPN-A.inet.0.

     

    I couldn't find any issues in the config.

     

    Regards,

    Moses N

     



  • 5.  RE: arp request

    Posted 10-25-2012 19:32

    thx



  • 6.  RE: arp request

    Posted 10-25-2012 21:31

    Hi Rob,

    1) with no-vrf-advertise , PE will not advertise any routes from that particular routing instance to other PEs.

    this feature is helpful when you need spoke-to-spoke communication through the Hub CE. In that case, we need to configure two routing instances in the hub PE , one primary with no-vrf-advertise and other one as secondary. These two will exchange the routes between them and secondary will advertise the hub routes to other PEs.

     

    you can find a similar example here 

    http://netscreen.com/techpubs/software/junos/junos83/swconfig83-vpns/id-11137054.html

     

    If we don't configure in this way, spoke to spoke communication will be through Hub PE. ( Not through Hub CE).

    This is not preferable when you need any egress features required at Hub PE.

     

     

    2) In Juniper Mpls VPN implementation , any routes learnt from a CE will be automatically advertised to other relevant PEs with the export communities. You don't need any policies. But on the other hands, routes learnt from remote PEs via MP-BGP will be advertised to local CEs, if local PE - CE protocol is bgp only. For other protocols , we need to have correct export policies.

     

    regards,

    Moses N

     

     



  • 7.  RE: arp request

    Posted 10-25-2012 22:27

    hi,Mose ,

    now between pe and ce is ospf,so with vrf target ,junos will export all ospf learnt from ce to other PE automaticall,right?



  • 8.  RE: arp request

    Posted 10-25-2012 22:48

    Yes. That's correct.



  • 9.  RE: arp request

    Posted 10-25-2012 23:04

    haha,if between ce and pe is static route,I think it will not advertise,right?



  • 10.  RE: arp request
    Best Answer

    Posted 10-26-2012 01:57

    No.

    It doesn't matter,   If PE-CE is static, it will be advertised to other PEs.

     

    Rgds

    Moses N