04-29-2012 02:55 PM
Hi Folks
I have SRX-3600 ACTIVE/PASSIVE firewall cluster. In the TRUST-ZONE, there is LAG reth interface, which consists of four physcial interfaces from each node.
My requirement is that as long as THREE physical interfaces are UP on primary node then this LAG reth interface is active on primary but if UP physical interfaces are less than THREE, for example UP physical interfaces are two on primary node then this LAG reht interfaces should failover to secondary node.
My question is that should I use minimum-link under the LAG reth interface OR should I use interface-monitor using weights under redundancy group configuration to achieve this? And what is the difference in each approach?
Thanks
04-29-2012 07:12 PM
Hi,
minimum-links under redundant-ether-options is just a criteria of reth link status . This setting will not be used for Redundancy group failover. Redundancy group primacy will be decided by the interface-monitoring only.
"Redundant Ethernet interface configuration also includes a minimum-links setting that allows you to set a minimum number of physical child links on the primary node in a given redundant Ethernet interface that must be working for the interface to be up. The default minimum-links value is 1. Note that the minimum-links setting only monitors child links on the primary node"
so, to meet your requirement
{primary:node0}[edit]
user@host# set interfaces reth1 redundant-ether-options minimum-links 3
user@host# set chassis cluster redundancy-group 1 interface-monitor reth1 weight 255
First statement is to bring down the reth interface when there are less than 3 child interfaces from primary node in UP state and Second statement is to failvoer the redundancy group (corresponding to reth interface which is down) to other node .
Note: Please note that I have never tried monitroing reth interface ( this is based on 11.2 documentation which states that SRX Series and J Series devices interface-monitoring feature now allows monitoring of redundant Ethernet/aggregated Ethernet interfaces)
04-30-2012 12:46 AM
So What I understand from your answer that, minimum-link only bring the reth interface down on primary node BUT it will not do the failover of reth interface from primary node to secondary node. Is that correct?
BUT interface-monitor will do two things:
1- Bring the reth interface down on primary node
2- Failover of reth interface from primary to secondary node
So whats the use of minimum-link knob?
Thanks
04-30-2012 01:00 AM
Hi,
interface-monitor will NOT do two things .
1- Bring the reth interface down on primary node
2- Failover of reth interface from primary to secondary node
for point#1 , we need minimum-links and point#2 (failover of RG actually) we need interface-monitor.
04-30-2012 02:16 AM
Thanks for the reply. But what is the use case of minimum-link then? If it is just bringing down the reth interface.
Thanks
04-30-2012 02:26 AM
Also could you please give me the exact link mentioning that interface-monitor is available for reth interfaces. Is it also supported in 11.1?
Thanks
12-18-2012 06:27 AM
*** bump ***