08-02-2011 10:33 PM
Hi Experts,
We have two SRX 3400 deployed in cluster mode Release 10.2R3.10
Uncommonly issue has been observed, when I apply "show security flow statistics" packet dropped counters on FPC1 is at negative side.
Output is as pasted below :
SRX1> show security flow statistics
node0:
--------------------------------------------------
Flow Statistics of FPC1 PIC0:
Current sessions: 103804
Packets forwarded: 0
Packets dropped: -1849679476
Fragment packets: 187009630
Flow Statistics of FPC2 PIC0:
Current sessions: 208073
Packets forwarded: 0
Packets dropped: 434164689
Fragment packets: 286918268
Flow Statistics of FPC4 PIC0:
Current sessions: 207600
Packets forwarded: 0
Packets dropped: 419478461
Fragment packets: 279940560
Flow Statistics of FPC6 PIC0:
Current sessions: 209437
Packets forwarded: 0
Packets dropped: 445921305
Fragment packets: 285182090
Flow Statistics Summary:
System total valid sessions: 728914
Packets forwarded: 0
Packets dropped: -550115021
Fragment packets: 1039050548
node1:
--------------------------------------------------
Flow Statistics of FPC1 PIC0:
Current sessions: 107685
Packets forwarded: 0
Packets dropped: -1809984198
Fragment packets: 296874156
Flow Statistics of FPC2 PIC0:
Current sessions: 215635
Packets forwarded: 0
Packets dropped: 495192121
Fragment packets: 457127338
Flow Statistics of FPC4 PIC0:
Current sessions: 213195
Packets forwarded: 0
Packets dropped: 471265571
Fragment packets: 461359670
Flow Statistics of FPC6 PIC0:
Current sessions: 212561
Packets forwarded: 0
Packets dropped: 511552389
Fragment packets: 458510846
Flow Statistics Summary:
System total valid sessions: 749076
Packets forwarded: 0
Packets dropped: -331974117
Fragment packets: 1673872010
============================================
I want to know the reason of this negative increase in packet dropped counters.
Any help would be highly appreciated.
Thanks !
Best Regards,
Hardik
08-03-2011 01:51 AM
Hi
If you go to the Problem Report search tool at support center and search for "negative", you
find a dozen of similar PRs (negative counters, etc). However I was unable to find exactly
one that will match your case.
So this is a bug, better to open a JTAC case to determine if it is a known or a new one.
08-03-2011 01:59 AM
Looks like a display bug. My guess would be that they are displaying an unsigned integer as a signed one.
Best open a case with jtac to have that fixed, but it looks only cosmetic to me.
08-03-2011 02:40 AM
Hi folks,
I opened a JTAC case, let me see how it goes.
BR//
Hardik
08-13-2011 10:15 AM
Hi,
It is suspected bug and fix available in 10.2R4 10.3R4 10.4R4 11.1R2 11.1R2.
BR//
Hardik