SRX

last person joined: yesterday 

Ask questions and share experiences about the SRX Series, vSRX, and cSRX.
  • 1.  SRX-240 fxp0-IP-flapping

    Posted 03-06-2014 04:31


    Hello,

    at first, sry for my bad english!

    I have a problem with my SRX-configs. First I will give some configuration information:


    I have two SRX 240 in Clusterwork. The following settings are configured:

    version 12.1X46-D10.2;
    groups {
        Node0 {
            system {
                host-name node0;
            }
            interfaces {
                fxp0 {
                    unit 0 {
                        family inet {
                            address 192.168.6.9/24;
                        }
                    }
                }
            }
        }
        Node1 {
            system {
                host-name node1;
            }
            interfaces {
                fxp0 {
                    unit 0 {
                        family inet {
                            address 192.168.6.10/24;
                        }
                    }
                }
            }
        }
    }
    apply-groups [ Node0 Node1 ];
    system{
    [...]
        services {
            ssh;
            web-management {
                https {
                    system-generated-certificate;
                    interface [ reth0.0 fxp0.0 ];
                }
            }
        }
    [...]
    }
    chassis {
        cluster {
            control-link-recovery;
            reth-count 1;
            redundancy-group 0 {
                node 0 priority 100;
                node 1 priority 1;
            }
        }
    }
    interfaces {
    [...]
        fab0 {
            fabric-options {
                member-interfaces {
                    ge-0/0/2;
                }
            }
        }
        fab1 {
            fabric-options {
                member-interfaces {
                    ge-5/0/2;
                }
            }
        }
    [...]
    }

     



    With show chassis cluster status I see that the cluster seems to work in the basic operation:
    Cluster Status.PNG

    And the follow pic show the ssh-access of both nodes:

    i.O..PNG


    And now, i want to explain my problem:
    There is a kind of "IP-flapping". During the ssh-session to a node, i suddently become a ssh-fatal error - the connection is closed.

    If i want to reconnect to this node, i'm logged to the another node with the same IP-address! This happens of both nodes every few minutes. It may also be, both IP-Adresses 192.168.6.9 & 192.168.6.10 logged to node0. Another time, both IP-Addresse logged to node1. Shown on the pics below:

     

    only-node0.PNG
    only-node1.PNG

    vertauscht.PNG

     

    What could cause the problem?

    I am grateful for any response!



  • 2.  RE: SRX-240 fxp0-IP-flapping
    Best Answer

    Posted 03-06-2014 05:01

    Hi,

     

    Your apply-groups look incorrect.

     

    Try the following:

     

    user@srx#delete apply-groups
    user@srx#set apply-groups “${node}”
    user@srx#commit

     



  • 3.  RE: SRX-240 fxp0-IP-flapping

    Posted 03-06-2014 06:09

    Hi MMcD!

     

    Thank you! This was the solution i think. The last 30 mins. i haven't  registered any ip-flapping.

     

    One little question i have (to understanding):

     

    It's normal when i connect over J-Web to 192.168.6.9 & 192.168.6.10, only the address of the primary node is approved?

    192.168.6.10 over J-web failed.

     



  • 4.  RE: SRX-240 fxp0-IP-flapping

    Posted 03-06-2014 06:27

    Hi Johannes,

     

    This is correct, only the primary node can be managed using the revenue port (fxp).  Failover and then the secondary should be manageable.

     

    You can login from the primary to the seconday via ssh with the following comand:

     

    user@srx>request routing-engine login node1

     



  • 5.  RE: SRX-240 fxp0-IP-flapping

    Posted 03-06-2014 06:58

    Thank you for answer.  The command could be useful for me.

     
    I have no more questions. I think the thread may be closed now.  🙂