SRX

last person joined: 6 hours ago 

Ask questions and share experiences about the SRX Series, vSRX, and cSRX.
  • 1.  SRX "license not installed for"

    Posted 01-04-2012 00:41

    Hello Groups,
    I have a questions about SRX UTM feature.
    I had install UTM license to my SRX 100h

    srx> show system license
    License usage:
    Licenses Licenses Licenses Expiry
    Feature name used installed needed
    av_key_kaspersky_engine 0 1 0 2012-01-24 00:00:00 UTC
    anti_spam_key_sbl 0 1 0 2012-01-24 00:00:00 UTC
    wf_key_surfcontrol_cpa 0 1 0 2012-01-24 00:00:00 UTC
    idp-sig 0 1 0 2012-01-24 00:00:00 UTC
    ax411-wlan-ap 0 2 0 permanent
    mem-upg 0 1 0 permanent
    appid-sig 0 1 0 2012-01-24 00:00:00 UTC
    av_key_sophos_engine 0 1 0 2012-01-24 00:00:00 UTC
    But after i had apply UTM policy to my security policy and commit configuration . SRX said:

    [edit security policies from-zone trust to-zone untrust policy trust-to-untrust then permit]
    'application-services'
    warning: license not installed for
    Not only anti-virus feature , but also web-filter and content filter had the same issue.

    another problem is :
    srx> request security utm ?
    Possible completions:
    anti-virus Request update anti-virus pattern information
    input "?" , i just could see anti-virus selection.
    my SRX100H's JunOS is 11.1R2.3.
    Please give me some advices. Thanks.



  • 2.  RE: SRX "license not installed for"
    Best Answer

    Posted 01-05-2012 10:11

    Hi!

     

    ... I had the same "problem".. and investigated. We also upgraded to the H version from the B version...

     

    it is a BUG within the system... and apparently you can NOT get rid of it...

     

    However in spite of the "error" all changes you make are really applied to the box. It is mostly annoying than anything else.

     

    Have a good one!



  • 3.  RE: SRX "license not installed for"

    Posted 01-05-2012 17:20

    Thanks for your help, so i think i have to upgrade my JunOS.

    I had open a case for this issue

    JTAC said:

    "this is a cosmetic bug and ithe issue is addressed in the following versions: 11.2R1 11.1R3 11.3R1 11.2R1 11.4R1 ."