Given something like:
unset flow reverse-route clear-text
set interface "ethernet0/0" zone "Trust"
set interface ethernet0/0 ip 192.168.1.1/24
set interface ethernet0/0 nat
set interface ethernet0/0 ip manageable
set interface ethernet0/3 zone untrust
set interface ethernet0/2 ip 10.0.0.1/24
set interface ethernet0/3 ip 10.0.1.1/24
set interface ethernet0/2 mip 10.0.0.10 host 192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.255 vr trust-vr
set interface ethernet0/3 mip 10.0.1.10 host 192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.255 vr trust-vr
is there a difference between:
set route 0.0.0.0/0 gateway 10.0.0.254
set route 0.0.0.0/0 gateway 10.0.1.254
and:
set route 0.0.0.0/0 interface ethernet0/0 gateway 10.0.0.254
set route 0.0.0.0/0 interface ethernet0/1 gateway 10.0.1.254
...ie is there a point to including the "interface" specifier in the route command?