Junos OS

Hi,

I have tried to use a group config within the vrf rather than list lots of interfaces (direct) i.e. 

set groups VRF_TEST_1XXX_INTERFACES routing-instances TEST interface "<ge-0/0/1.[1000-1100]>"

set routing-instances TEST apply-groups VRF_TEST_1XXX_INTERFACES

But after implementation the interfaces do not appear in the TEST VRF route table, they remain in the inet.0 table, the interfaces are 'up up' and all config looks good, has anyone used this method succesfuly ?

Thank you in advance of any replies

just an update, that using the 

#show routing-instances TEST | display inheritance

does not show the group being "inherited from group 'VRF_TEST_1XXX_INTERFACES'

Hi,

You need to do one more thing. Add a backslash "\" before your dot "." 

Otherwise, junos or any linux system will take it as an operator, instead of a normal character 

Try something like this

set groups test routing-instances test interface "<ge-1/0/0\.[1-4]>"

Hi Colin,

I don't think this configuration would work.

Thanks

Vishal

Hi,

Thank you both for taking time to respond, but just tried using the \ and did not work 😞

many thanks 

Colin

Hello,

---

@colin5000 wrote:

Hi,

I have tried to use a group config within the vrf rather than list lots of interfaces (direct) i.e. 

 

set groups VRF_TEST_1XXX_INTERFACES routing-instances TEST interface "<ge-0/0/1.[1000-1100]>"

set routing-instances TEST apply-groups VRF_TEST_1XXX_INTERFACES

 

But after implementation the interfaces do not appear in the TEST VRF route table, they remain in the inet.0 table,

---

Mass "insert" of interfaces under VRF hierarchy using regex/wildcards  is not supported.

You need to either insert every subinterface one by one, or use interface-sets.

HTH

Thx

Alex

Hi Alex,

Thanks for the response, I have searched for interface-set use within the VRF but nothing found to apply the interface-set name to the VRF, so looks like as you say I will have to list interfaces individuly.