Both SRX100 firewall are new ... and both have the same version
Model: srx100h
JUNOS Software Release [11.4R7.5]
yes we are not defing the w13 edge and w13 int and interfaces 30,31,32.
we are using the below routing instance,
routing-instances {
boredge {
instance-type virtual-router;
interface fe-0/0/1.785;
routing-options {
interface-routes {
rib-group inet boredge-to-inet0;
}
}
}
borint {
instance-type virtual-router;
interface fe-0/0/1.778;
interface fe-0/0/1.784;
routing-options {
static {
route 192.168.0.0/16 next-hop 192.168.10.1;
route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 172.25.33.1;
}
}
}
fededge {
instance-type virtual-router;
interface fe-0/0/3.789;
routing-options {
interface-routes {
rib-group inet fededge-to-inet0;
}
}
}
fedint {
instance-type virtual-router;
interface fe-0/0/3.787;
interface fe-0/0/3.788;
routing-options {
static {
route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 182.25.33.1;
}
}
}
But the server (VLAN785) present behind the firewall is not able to ping 192.168.10.1 (VLAN778) and vice versa...
But in working FW configuration... only VLAN are changed... and I am able to ping the server behind the firewall
Both config are same only VLAN are changed... But I seeing different behaviour with firewall.
I attached the topology of my set up as well... All details are metion there.
/Rajan